引用本文:陈福刚,沙 琳,边 杰,程绍玲,黄东,董敬东.锁骨下动脉盗血综合征的MRA诊断[J].大连医科大学学报,2010,32(1):67-70.
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 次   下载 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
锁骨下动脉盗血综合征的MRA诊断
陈福刚, 沙 琳, 边 杰, 程绍玲, 黄东, 董敬东
大连医科大学 附属第二医院 放射科,辽宁 大连 116027
摘要:
[目的] 通过PC-MRA、TOF-MRA和CE-MRA对锁骨下动脉盗血综合征诊断的比较分析,探讨综合运用不同方法磁共振血管成像(Magnetic resonance angiography,MRA)技术对锁骨下动脉盗血综合征进行诊断。[方法] 回顾性分析经DSA检查证实锁骨下动脉盗血综合征患者12例、12处狭窄(右侧4例,左侧8例),所有患者均行PC-MRA、TOF-MRA、CE-MRA和DSA检查。对三种MRA方法对锁骨下动脉盗血综合征的诊断进行比较分析。[结果] 锁骨下动脉窃血12例患者中,共12处狭窄(无名动脉4处,左侧锁骨下动脉起始部8处)。TOF-MRA对狭窄均未做出定性诊断,未能对窃血做出定性诊断与定量分析;CE-MRA对12处狭窄的定性诊断准确,对狭窄程度判断7例准确,对狭窄长度的诊断10例准确,对8例窃血定性诊断准确,不能对窃血进行定量分析;PC-MRA对所有12例窃血定性诊断准确,并做出定量分析。[结论] PC-MRA可以对锁骨下动脉窃血进行定性诊断和定量分析;CE-MRA能够对锁骨下动脉狭窄进行定性和定量诊断,可对部分锁骨下动脉窃血进行定性诊断但不能做定量分析,TOF-MRA对锁骨下动脉狭窄诊断能力有限;综合运用PC-MRA和CE-MRA可以对锁骨下动脉狭窄做出全面准确评价。
关键词:  磁共振血管造影术  颈动脉狭窄  盗血综合征
DOI:10.11724/jdmu.2010.01.17
分类号:R445
基金项目:
MRA in the diagnosis of subclavian steal syndrome
CHEN Fu-gang, SHA Lin, BIAN Jie, CHENG Shao-ling, HUANG Dong, DONG Jing-dong
Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116027, China
Abstract:
[Objective] To detect various kinds of Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) techniques in the diagnosis of subclavian steal syndrome, by comparing PC-MRA, TOF-MRA and CE-MRA. [Methods] Twelve patients with subclavian steal syndrome and twelve stenosis sites (4 on the right and 8 on the left) demonstrated by DSA. PC-MRA, TOF-MRA, CE-MRA and DSA were retrospectively analyzed. The three MRA techniques also compared. [Results] There were 12 stenosises in the 12 patients (4 in innominate artery and 8 in proximal left subclavian artery). TOF-MRA couldn't provide not only qualitative diagnosis on stenosis, but also qualitative and quantitative diagnosis on blood steal. CE-MRA gave correct qualitative diagnosis on 12 stenosis, accurately assessed the stenosis degree in 7 patients and the stenosis longitude in 10 patients. It also qualitatively diagnosed 8 cases of blood steal but failed for quantitative analysis. PC-MRA correctly diagnosed blood steal in all of 12 cases, both qualitative and quantitative. [Conclusion] PC-MRA could provide both qualitative and quantitative diagnosis to subclavian steal syndrome; CE-MRA could provide qualitative and quantitative diagnosis to subclavian stenosis and partial qualitative diagnosis to subclavian steal syndrome but not quantitative diagnosis of it; TOF-MRA is limited in subclavian stenosis. Accurate diagnosis to subclavian stenosis could be done by PC-MRA combined with CE-MRA.
Key words:  magnetic resonance angiography  carotid stenosis  subclavian steal syndrome