引用本文:吴小米,邹 红,赵 睿.釉质粘接剂与光固化窝沟封闭剂临床效果评价[J].大连医科大学学报,2008,30(2):168-169.
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 次   下载 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
釉质粘接剂与光固化窝沟封闭剂临床效果评价
吴小米, 邹 红, 赵 睿
重庆三峡中心医院 口腔门诊,重庆 404000
摘要:
[目的]评价釉质粘接剂用于窝沟封闭的临床应用价值及其效果。[方法]对780例6~12岁患儿的1560个上、下颌第一恒磨牙用釉质粘接剂进行窝沟封闭术,并釆用Estiseal光固化窝沟封闭剂自身对照的研究方法评价效果。[结果]随诊4年后发现釉质粘接剂组在1~4年的涂膜保留率均比可见光固化组高(P<0.01),但龋病患病率差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。[结论]釉质粘接剂是一种可靠、方便的化学窝沟封闭剂,值得临床推广应用。
关键词:  釉质粘接剂  窝沟封闭  磨牙
DOI:10.11724/jdmu.2008.02.25
分类号:R788
基金项目:
Clinical evaluation of enamel bonding agents and light-cured microfilled sealant
WU Xiao-mi, ZOU Hong, ZHAO Rui
Department of Dental,Sanxia Center Hospital,Chongqing 404000,China
Abstract:
[Objective]Evaluate clinical application value of the enamel Bonding agents in microfilled sealant. [Methods]Permanent molars 1560 in 780 patients aged from 6~12 years were treated with The enamel bonding agents and the Estiseal light-cured microfilled sealant and evaluation their result. The patients were followed up for 4 years.[Results]After 1~4 years the enamel bonding agents have high rate of coat holding (P<0.01). But the decayed tooth rate didn't show the difference (P>0.05). [Conclusion]The enamel bonding agents is a kind of credibility convenient chemistry microfilled sealant and deserve application in clinic.
Key words:  enamel bonding agents  microfilled sealant  molar