引用本文:张 旭,周孟赢,曹盛吉,李龙凯.抗Xa因子在日间CRRT低分子肝素抗凝监测中的临床应用[J].大连医科大学学报,2018,40(3):230-233.
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 次   下载 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
抗Xa因子在日间CRRT低分子肝素抗凝监测中的临床应用
张 旭1, 周孟赢1, 曹盛吉2, 李龙凯1
1.大连医科大学附属第一医院 肾内科,辽宁 大连 116011;2.大连医科大学附属第一医院 检验科,辽宁 大连 116011
摘要:
目的 探讨抗Xa因子在日间连续性肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)低分子肝素抗凝监测中的临床应用。方法 选择危重症慢性肾脏病5期进行日间CRRT治疗的患者62例,治疗过程中应用低分子肝素抗凝,分为抗凝未达标组、抗凝达标组和抗凝超标组。测定血红蛋白、血小板、抗凝血酶III、基础血肌酐值、基础APTT值,对治疗1 h抗Xa因子值、治疗1 h以及结束时APTT及肌酐下降率进行监测。结果 抗Xa因子三组间比较,差异均有统计学意义,P<0.05。抗凝达标组抗Xa因子为(0.62±0.37)IU/mL。1 h APTT抗凝未达标组与超标组比较,差异有统计学意义,P<0.05;肌酐下降率抗凝未达标组与其他两组比较,差异均有统计学意义,P<0.05。结论 抗Xa因子为(0.62±0.37)IU/mL时提示治疗安全、有效;抗Xa因子与APTT相比较,抗Xa因子对临床出血事件、血栓形成提示更有效。
关键词:  低分子肝素  抗Xa因子  APTT  CRRT
DOI:10.11724/jdmu.2018.03.08
分类号:R446.11+2;R459.5
基金项目:基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(31700847)
Anticoagulant monitoring of anti-Xa factor in daily CRRT using low molecular weight heparin
ZHANG Xu1, ZHOU Mengying1, CAO Shengji2, LI Longkai1
1.Department of Nephrology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, China;2.Department of Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, China
Abstract:
Objective  To explore the clinical application of anti-Xa factor monitoring anticoagulation of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in daily CRRT.  Methods  Totally 62 critically ill patients were selected, who had stage 5 chronic kidney disease and received daily CRRT with low molecular heparin anticoagulation in the treatment. The patients were divided into 3 groups, including below-standard anticoagulation group, standard anticoagulation group, and above-standard anticoagulation group. Serum levels of hemoglobin, platelet, antithrombin III, basic serum creatinine, and basic APTT were measured. Anti Xa-factor at 1 hour and APTT at 1 hour and the end of treatment creatinine rate descending were using for monitoring anticoagulant.  Results  Age, hemoglobin, platelet, creatinine and basic APTT values among the 3 groups were similar (P>0.05). Anti-Xa factor was significantly different among 3 groups (P<0.05) with anti-Xa factor in standard anticoagulation group (0.62±0.37) IU/mL. One hour APTT was significantly different between below-standard and above-standard anticoagulation groups (P<0.05). The creatinine reduction rate in below-standard anticoagulation group was significantly different compared to the other two groups (P<0.05).  Conclusion  When anti-Xa factor reaches the level of (0.62±0.37) IU/mL, it suggests that the treatment is safe and effective. Compared with APTT, anti-Xa factor is more effective for evaluating clinical bleeding events and thrombosis.
Key words:  low molecular weight heparin  anti-Xa factor  APTT  CRRT