引用本文:丁佳悦,翟乃兴,李 明,韩 杰.中等量高血压性脑出血不同治疗手段的临床疗效比较[J].大连医科大学学报,2016,38(3):288-290.
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 次   下载 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
中等量高血压性脑出血不同治疗手段的临床疗效比较
丁佳悦1, 翟乃兴2, 李 明1, 韩 杰1
1.大连医科大学附属第一医院 神经内科,辽宁 大连 116011;2.大连立光康复医院 康复一科,辽宁 大连 116600
摘要:
目的 比较保守治疗、微创颅内清除术和开颅手术治疗中等量高血压性脑出血的疗效。方法 收集符合纳入标准的出血量约30~50 mL的高血压性脑出血患者71例,根据患者及家属意愿分为三组,分别给予保守治疗,微创治疗及开颅手术治疗。比较三组患者治疗7 d、14 d及28 d神经功能恢复的情况,治疗1个月的临床疗效及6个月的日常生活能力(ADL)。结果 治疗7 d和14 d,微创组评分低于保守组及手术组(P<0.05),手术组评分低于保守组(P<0.05);治疗28 d,微创组评分低于保守组(P<0.05)。治疗1个月微创组总有效率为65.2%,手术组总有效率为62.5%,均高于保守组的25.0%;微创组死亡率30.4%,手术组死亡率为33.3%,均低于保守组的66.7%,P均<0.05,差异有统计学意义。治疗6个月保守组ADL分级I-II级1例,III-V级6例。微创组I-II级13例,III-V级3例。手术组I-II级5例,III-V级10例。微创组与保守组、微创组与手术组相比,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 微创术后患者存活率高,短期神经功能恢复快,长期独立生活能力优于手术组和保守组,是30~50 mL高血压性脑出血治疗的首选。
关键词:  高血压性脑出血  保守治疗  微创颅内血肿清除术  手术  疗效
DOI:10.11724/jdmu.2016.03.18
分类号:R743.9
基金项目:
Clinical curative effect comparison of different treatments on moderate hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage
DING Jia-yue1, ZHAI Nai-xing2, LI Ming1, HAN Jie1
1.Department of Neurology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, China;2.First Rehabilitative Department, Rehabilitation Hospital of Dalian Li Guang, Dalian 116600, China
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of conservative treatment, minimally invasive treatment and surgical treatment on hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage. Methods Seventy-one cases were collected in accordance with the inclusive criteria and were divided according to their wills into three groups, separately receiving conservative treatment, minimally invasive treatment and surgical treatment. Neural function recovery of each group was compared on the post-treatment 7th day, 14th day and 28th day. Clinical curative effect of three groups after 1 month treatment and long-term prognosis of each group were studied. Results  Neural functional deficit scores during different periods were compared. On the 7th and 14th day, the scores of minimally invasive group were lower than conservative group and surgery group (P<0.05), the score of surgery group was lower than conservative group (P<0.05). On the 28th day, the score of minimally invasive group was obviously lower than conservative group (P<0.01). After treatment of 1 month, the total effective rate of conservative group was 25.0%, mortality rate 66.7%, the total effective rate of minimally invasive group was 65.2% and mortality rate 30.4%, the total effective rate of surgery group was 62.5% and mortality rate 33.3%. In comparison of ADL grade after 6 months, conservative group had 1 case in grade I-II and 6 cases in grade III-V, minimally invasive group had 13 cases in grade I-II and 3 cases in grade III-V, surgery group had 5 cases in grade I-II and 10 cases in grade III-V. There were significant differences between conservative group and minimally invasive group (P<0.01), surgery group and minimally invasive group (P<0.05). Conclusions Minimally invasive treatment has high effective rate, the best short-term neural functional recovery and long-term independent living, and shows great curative effect in treating hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage in the amount of 30-50 mL.
Key words:  hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage  medicine conservative treatment  minimally invasive treatment  surgical treatment  curative effect