引用本文:朱 杰,王善菊,聂大平,常青燕.DNA含量分析和非白细胞细胞群CD44分子的检测在胸腔积液诊断和鉴别诊断中的价值[J].大连医科大学学报,2009,31(2):200-203.
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 次   下载 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
DNA含量分析和非白细胞细胞群CD44分子的检测在胸腔积液诊断和鉴别诊断中的价值
朱 杰1, 王善菊1, 聂大平1, 常青燕2
1.大连医科大学 附属第二医院 检验科,辽宁 大连116027;2.大连市第六人民医院 药剂科,辽宁 大连116021
摘要:
[目的] 探讨胸水脱落细胞的DNA含量分析和非白细胞细胞群CD44分子的检测在诊断和鉴别诊断良、恶性胸腔积液中的作用。[方法] 选取各种胸腔积液标本121例,包括恶性胸腔积液标本65例, 结核性胸腔积液24例, 和其他良性胸腔积液32例(对照组)。应用流式细胞术分别测定各组标本内DNA异倍体的含量、处于G0/G1 期细胞的百分比及胸水脱落细胞中非白细胞细胞群的CD44分子的表达,并对结果进行分析。[结果] 恶性胸腔积液组中,异倍体检出率为76.9%(50/65),DI值为1.14±0.03,而结核性胸腔积液组和对照组均未检出异倍体。G0/G1 含量分析中,对照组G0/G1 含量为(95.77 ± 2.30)%,PI (4.23±2.29)%;结核性胸腔积液组G0/G1 含量高于对照组(P<0.05),为(98.53±0.77)%,PI为(1.2±0.81)%;而未检出异倍体恶性胸腔积液组(n=15),与对照组比较差异则无显著性意义(P>0.05),其G0/G1 含量为(95.20±2.10)%,PI为(4.75±2.50)%。胸水脱落细胞中,中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞等白细胞群的CD44分子表达率均为100%。非白细胞细胞群中,对照组中CD44分子表达率为(25.02±12.20)%,恶性胸腔积液组表达率为(52.15±25.15)%,明显高于对照组(P<0.01),而结核胸腔积液组为(21.98±13.02)%,与对照组相比差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。[结论] 对胸腔积液脱落细胞进行DNA分析及检测非白细胞群CD44分子有助于诊断和鉴别诊断良、恶性及结核性胸腔积液。
关键词:  胸腔积液  DNA含量  CD44  流式细胞术
DOI:10.11724/jdmu.2009.02.24
分类号:R444.69
基金项目:
Diagnostic value of DNA content and CD44 in non-leukocyte cells in pleural effusion
ZHU Jie1, WANG Shan-ju1, NIE Da-ping1, CHANG Qing-yan2
1.Department of Clinical Laboratory, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116027;2.Department of Pharmacy, Dalian No.6 Six Hospital, Dalian 116021, China
Abstract:
[Objective] This work is to evaluate the role of DNA content and CD44 in non-leukocyte cells in diagnosis of pleural effusions. [Methods] One hundred and twenty-one patients with pleural effusion were divided into malignant pleural effusion group (n=65), tubercular pleural effusion group (n=24) and control group (n=32). DNA diploid, the percentage of G0/G1 in cell cycle and the expression of CD44 were examined by flow cytometry. [Results] (1) In malignant pleural effusion group, aneuploidy was detected in 50 of 65 patients (76.9%) and DNA index (DI) were 1.14±0.03, while the aneuploidy could not be seen in both tubercular pleural effusion and control groups. (2) In the analysis of the DNA cycle, the value of G0/G1 phase in tubercular pleural effusion group [(98.53±0.77)%, PI (1.2±0.81) %] was significantly higher than that in control group [(95.77±2.30)%, PI (4.23±2.29) %], P<0.05. In addition, there was no difference between malignant pleural effusion group with no aneuploidy [n=15, (95.20±2.10)%, PI (4.75±2.50)%]and control group. (3) Among the cells of pleural effusion, leukocytes showed 100% CD44 positive. For non-leukocyte cells, compared with control group [(25.02±12.20)%], the positive percentage of CD44 in malignant pleural effusion group significantly increased [(52.15±25.15)%], P<0.01, while there was no difference between tubercular pleural effusion [(21.98±13.02)%]and control groups(P>0.05).[Conclusion] Detection of DNA content and CD44 in non-leukocyte cells would be helpful for diagnosis or differential diagnosis of benignant, malignant, or tubercular pleural effusions.
Key words:  pleural effusions  DNA content  CD44  flow cytometry